<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" version="2.0"><channel><title>meteorhunter - whereIstand.com</title><link>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/</link><description>whereIstand.com: meteorhunter - whereIstand.com</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2004-2008 whereIstand.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 15:56:27 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>whereIstand.com 2.3</generator><managingEditor>nick@whereIstand.com</managingEditor><webMaster>nick@whereIstand.com</webMaster><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>Why should people who lived beyond their means be rewarded?</em></div></body><title>The Federal Government should not assist mortgage defaulters. (Mortgages)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/34402</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/34402</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:43:34 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;Why should people who lived beyond their means be rewarded?&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Mortgages</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>Given the sheer number of other worlds in the universe, and the unbelievable diversity
      here on ours, it is unbelievably likely almost to a certainty that some type of intelligence
      exists. Plus, where do you think they got all those weird aliens on Star Trek, huh?</em></div></body><title>There is intelligent life on other planets. (Space Exploration)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/4215</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/4215</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:31:43 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;Given the sheer number of other worlds in the universe, and the unbelievable diversity here on ours, it is unbelievably likely almost to a certainty that some type of intelligence exists.  Plus, where do you think they got all those weird aliens on Star Trek, huh?&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Space Exploration</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>Any form of discrimination against race is by definition racism. Just because
      we cloak it in some kind of label does not change that. All forms of racism are wrong,
      and illegal. Just apply the same 'affirmative action' assistance to the 'majority'
      race and see how that goes over. If someone screams 'that's racist', then they agree
      with your premise.</em></div></body><title>Affirmative action is unconstitutional. (Affirmative Action)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/25585</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/25585</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:29:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;Any form of discrimination against race is by definition racism.  Just because we cloak it in some kind of label does not change that.  All forms of racism are wrong, and illegal.  Just apply the same 'affirmative action' assistance to the 'majority' race and see how that goes over.  If someone screams 'that's racist', then they agree with your premise.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Affirmative Action</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>The first amendment to the constitution protects free speech. While it is reasonable
      to ban offensive or libelous speech, we have to let all forms of political protest
      continue. Those who burn the flag because they 'hate America' would probably be jailed
      or killed in many places outside of America for doing what they are at that precise
      moment. That is what makes our country the greatest on the planet. Only here can stupid
      people do something so idiotic as to protest against a form of government that allows
      them to protest in the first place. See dictionary definition - Irony.</em></div></body><title>The U.S. should not enact a constitutional amendment prohibiting the burning of the American flag. (Free Speech)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/6702</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/6702</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:26:11 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;The first amendment to the constitution protects free speech.  While it is reasonable to ban offensive or libelous speech, we have to let all forms of political protest continue.  Those who burn the flag because they 'hate America' would probably be jailed or killed in many places outside of America for doing what they are at that precise moment.  That is what makes our country the greatest on the planet.  Only here can stupid people do something so idiotic as to protest against a form of government that allows them to protest in the first place.  See dictionary definition - Irony.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Free Speech</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>This was a 'feel good' attempt to crush capitalism. It would have been a disaster
      for our economy.</em></div></body><title>The U.S. should not have signed the Kyoto Treaty. (Kyoto Protocol)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/7763</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/7763</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:20:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;This was a 'feel good' attempt to crush capitalism.  It would have been a disaster for our economy.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Kyoto Protocol</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>It depends on what you define as 'effective'. If you look at increasing freedom
      and personal liberty, then no, a democracy allows tyrany of the majority. A representative
      republic, like we have, is likely the best. If 'effective' is a goal like implementing
      a sudden, drastic change, then some totalitarian governments can accomplish that very
      quickly.</em></div></body><title>Democracy is not the most effective political system. (Political Philosophy)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/11754</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/11754</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:18:03 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;It depends on what you define as 'effective'.  If you look at increasing freedom and personal liberty, then no, a democracy allows tyrany of the majority.  A representative republic, like we have, is likely the best.  If 'effective' is a goal like implementing a sudden, drastic change, then some totalitarian governments can accomplish that very quickly.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Political Philosophy</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>Yeah, here is an incentive. We will move that carrier fleet with the cruise missle
      ships away from your coast if you do the right thing. I am just saying.</em></div></body><title>The U.S. should offer incentives to persuade Iran to abandon its nuclear program. (Confronting Iran)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/9726</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/9726</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 08:56:57 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;Yeah, here is an incentive.  We will move that carrier fleet with the cruise missle ships away from your coast if you do the right thing.  I am just saying.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Confronting Iran</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>How, oh how shall we live our lives without mommy government telling us what is
      ok to eat? Please help me.</em></div></body><title>Governments should not ban trans fats in commercially-prepared foods. (Obesity)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/18102</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/18102</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 08:55:47 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;How, oh how shall we live our lives without mommy government telling us what is ok to eat? Please help me.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Obesity</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>Name something the government does well? If the regulate more, they will want
      to control more, and the more they get involved the worse it will get.</em></div></body><title>The government should not regulate the cost of healthcare. (Healthcare)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/10014</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/10014</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:44:40 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;Name something the government does well?  If the regulate more, they will want to control more, and the more they get involved the worse it will get.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Healthcare</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>More pressure should be applied, like freezing assets or more sanctions. We still
      have a little more room to squeeze them. Let them take the first shot with military
      action, and then finish them off.</em></div></body><title>Diplomatic measures or pressure are the appropriate next steps that the US should take with Iran. (Confronting Iran)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/160</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/meteorhunter/160</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:42:35 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;More pressure should be applied, like freezing assets or more sanctions.  We still have a little more room to squeeze them.  Let them take the first shot with military action, and then finish them off.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Confronting Iran</category></item></channel></rss>