• Following(0)
  • Contacts
  • Register
  • Sign in
SearchAdvanced
  • All
  • Art & Entertainment
  • Business
  • Education
  • Environment
  • Family & Society
  • Health
  • Media
  • Politics
  • Science
  • Sports
  • Technology
  • Home
  • Opinions
  • Compare
  • Blogs
  • People
  • Issues
  • About whereIstand.com
Laslo Weger

whereIstand member

122 Opinions

5 Followers

  • Follow this Person
  • Share This Account
Search Opinions of Laslo Weger on:


Compare Laslo Weger to:
  • Opinions (5)
  • Agree (0)
  • Disagree (0)
  • Blog
ContactsAll
FollowersAll
Following


Browse
    Opinions (122)
4 Requested
    All Opinions
  • Science
    • Biology
    • Evolution
    • Geology
    • Nuclear Power
    • Paranormal Phenomena
    • Physics
    • Psychology
    • Space Exploration
    • Stem cell research
Notify me when stands are taken by Laslo Weger

Laslo Weger - Science

[2,663 opinions•106 issues ]

1 to 6 of 36

  • 738Opinions
  • Take a stand
The federal government should not subsidize the creation of new stem cell lines.
The government should not subsidize anything. However, they should not put roadblocks for organizations that want to create new stem cell lines either.

Stand Taken 8/12/2008 10:35 AM

  • 25Opinions
  • Take a stand
Animal cloning should be allowed.
Since I believe human cloning should be allowed, it makes sense to believe animal cloning should be allowed as well.

Stand Taken 7/11/2008 8:27 PM

  • 180Opinions
  • Take a stand
Human cloning should be allowed.
Since I do not understand why not, my default answer is yes...

Stand Taken 6/13/2008 4:04 PM | 1 comments

  • 18Opinions
  • Take a stand
The use of nuclear weapons can be justified.
A weapon is a weapon. "Conventional" bombing of Tokyo in 1945 left over 100,000 dead; the Hiroshima explosion took 66,000 lives. And yet it was mainly the atomic bomb that convinced Japanese to surrender. Since the nuclear weapon was both more humane and more effective, why shouldn't it be used???

Stand Taken 6/6/2008 4:36 PM

  • 55Opinions
  • Take a stand
Theories that no conceivable experiment can confirm should not be rejected outright.
The standard scientific method postulates that a scientific theory must be falsifiable, and not confirmable. That is, all propositions for which there is no experiment that could invalidate it are not scientific theories. As a matter of fact, most (or even all) theories of physics (such as theory of gravity) cannot be 100% proven.

Stand Taken 5/21/2008 8:31 PM

  • 19Opinions
  • Take a stand
Request this Opinion
Is research published in peer-reviewed scientific journals reliable?
No opinion or opinion not known.
ContactsEmailSocial Bookmarking

You must be signed in to participate on whereIstand.com.

Register now to take stands, follow people and issues, request opinions and interact with other whereIstand members.

You must be signed in to participate on whereIstand.com.

Register now to take stands, follow people and issues, request opinions and interact with other whereIstand members.

this is a link button

© Copyright 2004-2007 whereIstand.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
580 Broadway, Suite 904, New York, NY 10012

  • Terms
  • Contact
  • Privacy
  • About whereIstand.com
  • About the wIs Community
  • Site Map