環境についてのrentacop76
<< rentacop76
Topics
Logging
Wildlife
環境保護庁
京都議定書
公害
自然災害
石油依存
代替エネルギー
地球温暖化
廃棄物管理
Opinions
スーパーのプラスチックの袋は禁止されるべきではない。 I reuse them either as trash bags (trash can liners) or lunch bags. The plastic itself is recyclable, so what's the problem?
地球温暖化と自然災害の増加に関係があるかどうか結論には達していない。 In fact, there is no conclusive evidence of global warming itself. It is all based on speculation - it has to be, because the scientists who cooked up this global warming theory have nothing tangible with which to compare our world.
States should not be allowed to adopt tougher fuel efficiency regulations than the federal standard. It's unnecessary. Auto manufacturers will be developing more fuel-efficient cars anyway because they know that's what more people today will buy. It's simple marketing sense. They already know what the score is, they don't need the government putting an e
EUは京都議定書を批准しない国からの輸入品に課税するべきではない。 But I bet they will anyway, out of spite if nothing else.
Buying a used conventional engine car is more environmentally friendly than buying a new hybrid. I don't think it makes much of a difference, but I would think it's better to buy used than to let those drivable cars sit and rot in a junkyard. Aren't we trying to cut down on waste? Isn't waste bad for the environment?
Congress should not raise the gas tax. Higher gas taxes equal higher gas prices. High gas prices are a big part of what got us into this financial mess in the first place!
政権の計画と対応から、政権は結局良くも悪くもならないことが予測できる。 The administration is a total lame duck, so there's not much they can do now that could make things much worse for them politically than what they have already done.
現在の大気汚染法は規制を減らすべきだ。 As I said earlier, many of the laws are difficult to comply with, and require the poor to spend more than they can afford. Many of these laws do not really have a tangible effect on the air pollution levels.
公害法は経済に否定的影響を及ぼしている。 Many of these laws are not only unnecessary and/or redundant, but are difficult to enforce and even more difficult to comply with. Compliance often requires a higher investment than many people can afford.
埋め立て地は民営化されるべきだ。 Properly regulated, but allow the various disposal companies to purchase rights to these landfills.
車の警報装置は禁止されるべきだ。 Maybe banned isn't the right word, although I would love it if they were. Besides being annoying, they are ineffective, and when they're set off, they do nothing except make noise, run the battery down, and to add insult to injury, they do NOT attract ser
The U.S. Bureau of Land Management should not euthanize wild horses to curb overpopulation.
Government should not regulate mercury levels in the environment. Mercury is a naturally-occurring element that appears on the periodic table. How is it possible to regulate an element that occurs in nature?
Reducing meat consumption is not an effective way to combat global warming. I see zero connection between the two, even assuming that there is any validity at all to this global warming theory.
カトリーナの前に、自治体と連邦政府は堤防破損の可能性があることを知っていた。 How could they not? Has history taught us nothing? These "authorities" are from the same breed as those who could not imagine anything that could cause the Titanic to sink.
エタノール生産の拡大は環境に否定的影響を及ぼす。 It will reduce the food supply.
気候の変化は経済に何の影響も及ぼさない。 I have seen no definitive evidence that the climate is even changing. The hype is being used to justify a socialist agenda. Many environmental extremists have called for at least a 60% reduction in the world human population, calling the human race (accor
政府は義務的なリサイクルプログラムを作るべきではない。 There's already enough voluntary recycling, leave well enough alone. We have more important things to spend our tax money on besides a "garbage police."
エタノール生産拡大は経済に否定的影響を及ぼす。 It's already having a negative effect. Have you noticed how the price of corn skyrocketed lately?
リサイクルの利点は費用を上回るものである。 If it's done right, yes.
米国は国有林での商業伐採を許可するべきではない。 We do need to leave some of them alone.
Polar bears should not be listed under the Endangered Species Act. The polar bears are fine. Since we hardly ever go above the Arctic Circle (where most polar bears live), we don't see them too often. But just because we don't see them doesn't mean they're not there.
米国は京都議定書に署名するべきではなかった。 I am totally against signing any treaty that would allow any outside (foreign) entity to determine American policy. This is why I am against our continued membership in the UN - the UN practically owns half our country already, which is why our education
地球温暖化は主に人間によって引き起こされた問題か; 地球が不自然に温暖化している決定的な証拠はない。 This is little more than political doomsayers pandering to environmental extremists like Greenpeace (who have said that "humans are the only optional life form on earth." that's a happy thought isn't it?). Again, click here for more info... http://www.ama
地球温暖化は、解決のために人間が行動を起こさなければならない問題ではない。 There is no definitive proof that it's even happening. There is no conclusive evidence that it's not a part of the natural cycle. Check out this link for more... http://www.amazon.com/review/product/1594032106/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?%5Fencoding=UTF8&sho
米国はアラスカの国立野生動物保護区での石油掘削を許可するべきだ。 We've been buying other countries' oil, the price of which keeps skyrocketing. Meanwhile we have our own that we haven't touched. How does that make sense? It's like eating at a restaurant when you're broke despite having some food in your freezer. We hav
The U.S. can meet all of its energy demands within 10 years through carbon-free sources. If we install enough solar panels in the deserts of Arizona and Nevada, we could collect enough energy to power half the country. In addition, wind turbines can be placed almost anywhere, although they work best out in the open. Those are logical low-cost
米国政府は低燃費車の製造業者に奨励金を支給するべきではない。 The consumers are giving them enough incentive to do that already. The manufacturers know that the people are buying what's more fuel-efficient, so it makes sense for them to do that anyway.
米国はメキシコ湾での石油とガス掘削を拡大するべきである。 Like I said earlier, why are we buying oil from other countries when we have our own? That makes no sense.
政府は温室効果ガスの排出を制限するべきではない。 Leave well enough alone. Let the state environmental organizations handle that.
地球温暖化は止めることができない。 Global warming is an unproven theory, and I think it's total bunk.
米国政府はガスの標準マイル基準を上げるべきではない。 Didn't we already do that? Besides, we have this new hydro-converter device that you can install in your car's engine. It does something with water and gas, and basically triples your car's gas mileage.
環境保護庁は効果的に環境を保護していない。 I don't think they make a great deal of difference. The state agencies do just fine without any EPA assistance.
Congress should lift the ban on offshore oil drilling. We need oil. We have oil available to us on our land. Why are we buying from other countries when we have our own? This seems pretty simple and straightforward to me.
連邦政府は戦略的石油備蓄からの石油を解除するべきである。 The oil is there to be used. Use it. Seems pretty simple and straightforward to me. You want to reduce our dependence on foreign oil? There's at least a stopgap solution.
UNKNOWN: 温室効果ガス排出を減らすために、どの計画が最も効果的か？
UNKNOWN: 人種差別はカトリーナに対する政府の対応に影響したか？
UNKNOWN: 政府はカトリーナの対応に準備万端だったか？
UNKNOWN: アル・ゴアはノーベル平和賞を受賞するべきか？
UNKNOWN: 州兵の海外派遣は、カトリーナに対する政府の対応能力に影響したか？