科学についてのoldthom

<< oldthom

Topics

Opinions

既存の生命を救うことは、潜在的な生命を保護することより重要である。 Remember that old joke, What would you do if you were trapped in a barrel up to your neck in crap and someone threw a bucket of snot at your face? This question and it's choices leave me with the general feeling this joke is meant to foster. Both are eq

生体に特許を発行するべきではない。 Actually this is a step needed to insure the privatization of animal and human cloning. It will happen, question is are we going to be prepared? Some very, very serious research, discussion and regulations must take place before any such eventuality ... i

成人幹細胞はES 細胞と同じ医療的潜在能力を持っている。 All extreme passions aside, yes! Recent research and cases in Europe and Israel have shown adult stem cells do seem to have more potential that embryonic stem cells. Thank God! :-)

人間は今は進化していない。 No, we did not "evolve" in the first place. However, this is tough question to answer. Are humans subject to the same laws we see in nature? I believe we were created as a unique being in the image and likeness of God, creator of all things. I see no proo

自然淘汰を信じるためには、進化論を信じることが必要ではない。 It does not require it, but it is an element in evolution.

?????????????????????? Not at the expense of life on this earth. Until we achieve some balance and moderation here on our planet, space exploration (or exploitation) must wait.

The Earth is several billion years old. To date, with the best scientific methods available most scientists, across many disciplines, agree that the age of the earth is around 4.5 billion years. I have seen some studies that even suggest the earth is older. Even the Catholic Church acknowledges

胚幹細胞が医学研究に使われるかどうかを決めるべきなのは連邦政府である。 It is too big of an area for any one state or group to oversee. It has huge social, moral and scientific potential and ramifications, not unlike that of nuclear proliferation or war itself. This should not be taken lightly or left in the hands of those wh

核兵器の使用は正当化することができる。 Oh yes it can! In the hands of the right [mad]man anything can and will be justified.

正当で科学的で同業者による論評の対象となる進化論の「代案」はある。 Look Americans are largely ignorant of the strong worldwide scientific consensus backing evolutionary theory. For most Americans there is "us" and everyone else. That is a shame really. There are some valid alternatives to evolution being researched that

他の惑星に知的生命体はいる。 "Is" probably or rather why not? Kinda ego-centric to think God is only looking out for us. We might be surprised to find what is in heaven and what is not. Still I wouldn't be surprised if we are the only ones and all this was made just for us.

NASAは有人宇宙飛行に集中するべきである。 It takes a combination of things, but yes it should be our primary focus.

NASAは国際宇宙ステーションの建設を完了するべきである。 One of our greatest frontiers is space. If it weren't for all the turf wars, greed and avarice between nations, societies and cultures we would be out there right now exploring as much as we can.

クローン人間作成は許されるべきではない。 No. With no further comment.

米国は他国の核開発計画に干渉するべきではない。 No not as an individual country. This should be done with our present world governing body, the UN.

米国は原子力発電所をさらに建設するべきだ。 With what we have learned over the past half century it makes sense to use this as a viable alternative. It must be carefully regulated and controlled as to where they can be built, however.

科学者は胚幹細胞研究を進めるべきではない。 NO! the idea of taking an unborn embryo's chance at life is moralling and ethically wrong, imo. We now have access to adult cells which make for even better research and results.

連邦政府は、新しい幹細胞株作りに助成金を支給するべきである。 But only the basis of using adult stem cells, not embryonic.

UNKNOWN: 人間の行動により大きな影響を及ぼしているのは何か？

UNKNOWN: 科学者が遺伝子組み換えの人間の胚細胞を作ることを合法にするべきか？

UNKNOWN: 正当で科学的で同業者による論評の対象となる進化論の批判はあるか？

UNKNOWN: どんな実験でも確証できない理論は真っ向から否定されるべきか？

UNKNOWN: 心理学者は薬剤を処方できるようになるべきか？

UNKNOWN: 幽霊は存在するか？

UNKNOWN: Is a large ego necessary to being a successful politician?

UNKNOWN: Will humans make contact with intelligent extraterrestrial life?

UNKNOWN: What is the shape of the Earth?

UNKNOWN: クローン動物の作成は許されるべきか？

UNKNOWN: 人間はいつか光速度より早く旅をするだろうか？

UNKNOWN: Are emotions contagious?

UNKNOWN: 議会は、潜在的に危険な小惑星と彗星を追跡するためにNASAのプログラムに資金提供するべきか？

UNKNOWN: 宇宙は拡大しているか？

UNKNOWN: ウイルスは生きているか？

UNKNOWN: 人間はタイムトラベルをするべきか？

UNKNOWN: Should humans colonize the moon?

UNKNOWN: 人間はいつかタイムトラベルをするだろうか？

UNKNOWN: 論文審査のある科学雑誌に発表された研究は信頼できるか？

UNKNOWN: 代替宇宙は存在するか？

UNKNOWN: Will the Large Hadron Collider discover the existence of unknown particles?

UNKNOWN: ひも理論は有効か？