dinhternet - Media
<< dinhternet
Topics
Advertising
Fashion & Design
Freedom of The Press
Internet
Investigation & Controversy
Media Conglomerates & Ownership
Media Regulation
News
Print Journalism
Radio
Television
Opinions
There should not be legal protection for celebrities who are frequent paparazzi targets.
The FCC should not relax its media ownership rules. We need more diverse media, not less.
The New Yorker cover featuring Barack and Michelle Obama is effective satire. By virtue of the attention it's getting.
The Wall Street Journal should move to a free online model. Free basic readership + pay plans for advanced services = more money made.
Internet gambling should not be banned. Why is internet gambling worse than any other gambling?
Newspaper organizations are not necessary to maintain journalistic standards. Attention on good writers will rise up, whether they below to organizations or not.
The Internet should not be regulated by one governing body. There should be no governing body.
Advertisements can have artistic value. And should, if they want to succeed.
Tim Russert's death did not merit the media coverage it received.
I know about RSS reader but choose not to use it.
Congress should pass legislation to mandate network neutrality on the Internet.
The Fairness Doctrine should not be reinstated.
Bloggers should not be held responsible for comments posted on their blogs by others.
Citizen journalism has a positive effect on news reporting.
The American news media did not appropriately handle coverage leading up to the war in Iraq.
Print newspapers will become obsolete.
The media is politically biased, but both sides balance one another out. I wouldn't say "balance out," though, as prominent biases on both sides polarize.
XM and Sirius satellite radio should be allowed to merge.
Consolidation has a negative effect on the media.
The U.S. should enact the Free Flow of Information Act.
Blogs have a positive effect on politics. Being able to express your views and discuss those views with others is always a good thing. I can see how blogs can be perceived as a negative effect, as the most extreme views are the ones that often get the most attention, but there's always a way to
UNKNOWN: Are blogs credible sources of news?
UNKNOWN: Should political candidates allow the media to interview their young children?
UNKNOWN: Is Fox News "fair and balanced?"
UNKNOWN: Should the decibel level of television commercials be regulated?
UNKNOWN: Should laws allowing journalists to protect confidential sources apply to bloggers?
UNKNOWN: Should Congress pass the Internet Radio Equality Act?
UNKNOWN: Should television news entertain as well as inform?
UNKNOWN: Were the Vanity Fair photos featuring Miley Cyrus appropriate?
UNKNOWN: Should Dunkin' Donuts have pulled the ad featuring Rachael Ray?
UNKNOWN: Should paparazzi be required to obtain permission from the people they photograph?
UNKNOWN: Is MSNBC politically biased?
UNKNOWN: Should the news media cover celebrities' personal lives?
UNKNOWN: Should the FCC allow white spaces for wireless high-speed Internet access?
UNKNOWN: Should states charge sales tax for online purchases?
UNKNOWN: Should the government provide financial assistance to the print journalism industry?
UNKNOWN: Is the New York Post's chimpanzee cartoon racist?
UNKNOWN: Do Don Imus' comments regarding the Rutgers women's basketball team warrant his termination?
UNKNOWN: Should websites allow anonymous comments?
UNKNOWN: Is it appropriate for the President of the United States to make appearances on late night talk shows?