1 to 10 of 705
The U.S. government should not subsidize corn-based ethanol.
Stand Taken 12/2/2008 8:59 PM
108 Opinions
Stand Taken 11/28/2008 3:03 PM
35 Opinions
Stand Taken 11/26/2008 2:34 AM
239 Opinions
Stand Taken 11/25/2008 3:50 PM
96 Opinions
Stand Taken 11/24/2008 6:55 PM
92 Opinions
Stand Taken 11/24/2008 5:54 PM
237 Opinions
Stand Taken 11/24/2008 4:12 PM
154 Opinions
Stand Taken 11/23/2008 10:45 PM
176 Opinions
Stand Taken 11/22/2008 5:01 PM
28 Opinions
Stand Taken 11/22/2008 12:40 PM
70 Opinions
At the top of my personal list of current expenditures that could be cut would be ethanol and argricultural subsidies
11/30/2008 5:55 PM
"Feds Get It Wrong Again: Ethanol, a Troublesome Substitute for Oil, Natural Gas, Coal, and Nuclear Power"
11/26/2008 7:02 AM
Ethanol isn't the answer. Corn-based ethanol has led to increased food costs for both farmers and families.
10/22/2008 12:54 PM
I support the use of celluosic ethanol, but not corn-based ethanol.
10/4/2008 6:34 PM
Why are we wasting our resources here? Ethanol is not even proven to be environmentally friendly
8/17/2008 4:54 PM
You must be signed in to participate on whereIstand.com.
Register now to take stands, follow people and issues, request opinions and interact with other whereIstand members.