1 to 10 of 101

Graffiti can be considered art.

"graffiti is without question the most powerful art movement in recent history."

posted by brianrApproved 11/30/2008 6:16 AM

Public Figure

2 Opinions

Graffiti can not be considered art.

 Stand Taken 11/15/2008 3:35 PM

whereIstand member

655 Opinions

Graffiti can be considered art.

Anything can be considered art. But should it?

 Stand Taken 11/15/2008 9:06 AM

Graffiti can not be considered art.

It may be artistic, even beautiful and powerful, but if it is on the side of a bus, building... then it is not. The difference between a flower and a weed is whether or not it is in its proper place.

 Stand Taken 11/14/2008 5:17 PM

Graffiti can be considered art.

 Stand Taken 11/14/2008 3:23 PM

Graffiti can be considered art.

 Stand Taken 11/14/2008 12:37 AM

Graffiti can be considered art.

Sometimes it is; sometimes it isn't; but it can be.

 Stand Taken 11/13/2008 9:07 PM

Graffiti can not be considered art.

Graffiti, as I define it, is defacing property - public or private. If it's done on a proper medium (or with permission from the property owner) then it's not a problem. But graffiti, as I define it, ...

 Stand Taken 11/10/2008 3:45 PM

Graffiti can be considered art.

 Stand Taken 11/5/2008 11:41 PM

Graffiti can be considered art.

Those who think its not are way behind the art worlds opinion of especially art in the past 10 years, not to mention artists like keith herring and basquiat from the 1980s.

 Stand Taken 11/3/2008 7:58 AM

whereIstand member

9 Opinions