1 to 10 of 89
Congress should not fund a troop surge in Iraq.
Stand Taken 10/10/2008 2:57 PM
174 Opinions
2 Followers
posted by TMassApproved 10/6/2008 2:25 PM
26 Opinions
1 Followers
Stand Taken 9/27/2008 4:48 PM
348 Opinions
Stand Taken 9/5/2008 11:47 PM
83 Opinions
Stand Taken 9/4/2008 9:30 PM
292 Opinions
Stand Taken 8/18/2008 1:16 PM
380 Opinions
Stand Taken 8/18/2008 1:49 AM
209 Opinions
4 Followers
Stand Taken 8/13/2008 11:18 AM
466 Opinions
posted by TMassApproved 8/13/2008 12:29 AM
42 Opinions
3 Followers
posted by RyanWApproved 7/30/2008 4:57 PM
36 Opinions
9 Followers
Congress "should not" fund surge, but may be forced to - Approve (5), Reject (5)[Vote on evidence ]
Rep. Eshoo voted in favor of House Concurrent Resolution 63, a very basic, straightforward piece of legislation expressing disapproval of the President's proposal to escalate the war by sending an additional 21,500 troops to Iraq
9/17/2008 10:30 PM
Iraq needs a diplomatic surge not a military surge
9/16/2008 10:45 PM
I oppose this escalation because I do not believe it will make America safer or improve security in Iraq
9/15/2008 8:11 PM
We must now demand that the Congress assert its Constitutional role and check the delusional policy of escalation adopted by President Bush
8/27/2008 9:08 PM
You must be signed in to participate on whereIstand.com.
Register now to take stands, follow people and issues, request opinions and interact with other whereIstand members.