Should theories that no conceivable experiment can confirm be rejected outright?


No

1 to 10 of 56

whereIstand member

429 Opinions

Theories that no conceivable experiment can confirm should not be rejected outright.

Necessity is the mother of invention. Science is based on reaching past what we perceive we are able to do. If we don't have a current way to test, we find a way to do so. By the way, 'theories' in...

 Stand Taken 11/11/2008 8:33 AM

Theories that no conceivable experiment can confirm should not be rejected outright.

1)Do you know the difference between a theory and a hypothesis? (hint: theories already HAVE evidence to support them) 2)Keywords: "conceivable experiment"; there may be some disagreement on what is "...

 Stand Taken 10/31/2008 2:43 PM

Theories that no conceivable experiment can confirm should not be rejected outright.

If religion can do it why can't science? Virtually all of religious beliefs cannot be proven. Or at least without a time machine and with the technology present it doesn't appear that a time machine ...

 Stand Taken 10/30/2008 10:57 PM

whereIstand member

233 Opinions




Opinions Requested