<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Lindsey Graham (R-SC) - whereIstand.com</title><link>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/</link><description>whereIstand.com: Lindsey Graham (R-SC) - whereIstand.com</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2004-2008 whereIstand.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:23:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>whereIstand.com 2.3</generator><managingEditor>nick@whereIstand.com</managingEditor><webMaster>nick@whereIstand.com</webMaster><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">Lindsey Graham (R-SC)</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina was the only Republican on the Judiciary
      Committee to vote yes on the Supreme Court nomination of the irrefutably well-qualified
      Sonia Sotomayor.</em></div></body><title>Sonia Sotomayor is a good choice to replace Justice Souter. (Obama Chooses Sonia Sotomayor To Replace Justice Souter On The Court)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/129229</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/129229</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:57:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina was the only Republican on the Judiciary Committee to vote yes on the Supreme Court nomination of the irrefutably well-qualified Sonia Sotomayor.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Obama Chooses Sonia Sotomayor To Replace Justice Souter On The Court</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">Lindsey Graham (R-SC)</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>I hope that we’ll hear more of this, because the young men and women taking
      the streets in Tehran need our support</em></div></body><title>The Obama Administration should issue a statement of support to the Iranian election uprising.  (Election Controversy In Iran)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/163424</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/163424</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:42:12 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;em&gt;I hope that we’ll hear more of this, because the young men and women taking the streets in Tehran need our support&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Election Controversy In Iran</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">Lindsey Graham (R-SC)</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>"publicly voiced support for Sanford to stay on as governor"</em></div></body><title>Mark Sanford should not resign as governor of South Carolina.  (Mark Sanford Leaves Town, Admits Infidelity)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/166076</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/166076</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:17:28 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;em&gt;"publicly voiced support for Sanford to stay on as governor"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Mark Sanford Leaves Town, Admits Infidelity</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">Lindsey Graham (R-SC)</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>"This is a very, very bad idea."</em></div></body><title>Federal judge Jay Bybee should not be impeached for authoring memos that justified Bush Administration interrogation techniques. (Bush-Era Detainee Policies)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/96847</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/96847</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:30:54 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;em&gt;"This is a very, very bad idea."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Bush-Era Detainee Policies</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">Lindsey Graham (R-SC)</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>It’s good for the troops to know that their commander-in- chief is going
      to bat for them and that is what he did today.</em></div></body><title>President Obama should not release new photos depicting U.S. detainee abuse.  (Bush-Era Detainee Policies)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/118839</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/118839</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:45:32 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;em&gt;It’s good for the troops to know that their commander-in- chief is going to bat for them and that is what he did today.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Bush-Era Detainee Policies</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">Lindsey Graham (R-SC)</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>the idea of "criminalizing legal advice after one administration is out of
      the office is a very bad precedent</em></div></body><title>The Department of Justice should not prosecute CIA officials who carried out Bush Administration interrogation methods. (Bush-Era Detainee Policies)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/96719</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/96719</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:49:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;em&gt;the idea of "criminalizing legal advice after one administration is out of the office is a very bad precedent&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Bush-Era Detainee Policies</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">Lindsey Graham (R-SC)</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>"[a] left-driven desire to prosecute people"</em></div></body><title>President Obama should not appoint a special prosecutor to investigate Bush Administration policies. (Obama Administration)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/70892</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/70892</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:33:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;em&gt;"[a] left-driven desire to prosecute people"&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Obama Administration</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">Lindsey Graham (R-SC)</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>a "huge tactical and strategic mistake, done for political reasons."</em></div></body><title>Memos about CIA torture techniques should not have been released by the Obama Administration.  (Bush-Era Detainee Policies)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/96723</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/96723</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:26:45 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;em&gt;a "huge tactical and strategic mistake, done for political reasons."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Bush-Era Detainee Policies</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">Lindsey Graham (R-SC)</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>And they said a commission would "focus on the mistakes of the past" instead
      of "looking forward to solutions."</em></div></body><title>Congress should not investigate the Bush Administration's interrogation policies. (Bush-Era Detainee Policies)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/96734</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/96734</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:15:37 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;em&gt;And they said a commission would "focus on the mistakes of the past" instead of "looking forward to solutions."&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Bush-Era Detainee Policies</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">Lindsey Graham (R-SC)</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>Eric Holder meets that test and for that reason I will support his nomination.</em></div></body><title>Eric Holder is a good choice for U.S. Attorney General. (Obama's Nominations)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/67037</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/LindseyGraham/67037</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:57:09 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;em&gt;Eric Holder meets that test and for that reason I will support his nomination.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Obama's Nominations</category></item></channel></rss>