Opinion Source Information:
JohnKerry
A nuclear-free world is not something we can (or should) accomplish quickly, by ourselves, or without close consultations with allies. We will need to maintain our military’s overwhelming non-nuclear edge along the way. A series of incremental steps can build on one another to produce a big change.
We also need to strengthen the international non-proliferation regime. The regime’s bargain is that non-nuclear states forswear nuclear weapons, while nuclear states agree to work towards a nuclear-free world and spread the benefits of nuclear energy. As we put pressure on non-nuclear countries to keep their word, we can strengthen our hand by leading by example. That alone will not persuade rogue states to co-operate – but it does maximise our leverage if they do not. America should lead an international effort to freeze, then verifiably ban, all production of nuclear material for weapons.
The president must also lead an effort to provide developing countries with incentives to reject enrichment and reprocessing programmes: establishing a “nuclear fuel bank” that guarantees access to international supplies of reasonably priced nuclear fuel.
In the coming months, the presidential candidates will engage in a fierce foreign policy debate, which I welcome. But when it comes time to govern, let us help the next president breathe life into an emerging bipartisan vision of a nuclear-weapons-free world.