<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" version="2.0"><channel><title>JCliffordCook - whereIstand.com</title><link>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/</link><description>whereIstand.com: JCliffordCook - whereIstand.com</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2004-2008 whereIstand.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:27:12 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>whereIstand.com 2.3</generator><managingEditor>nick@whereIstand.com</managingEditor><webMaster>nick@whereIstand.com</webMaster><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>I can't believe that Sarah Palin thinks that the Founding Fathers wrote the Pledge
      of Allegiance. Actually, the Founders saw no reason to write a pledge, and if the
      lack of a pledge is good enough for them, then it's good enough for me. Using a pledge
      of allegiance to the country to push Christianity on children is tacky.</em></div></body><title>The Pledge of Allegiance should not include the phrase "under God," because it was put in for explicitly religious purposes and as such should be removed. (Religion and Government)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/184</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/184</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 13:28:52 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;I can't believe that Sarah Palin thinks that the Founding Fathers wrote the Pledge of Allegiance. Actually, the Founders saw no reason to write a pledge, and if the lack of a pledge is good enough for them, then it's good enough for me.  Using a pledge of allegiance to the country to push Christianity on children is tacky.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Religion and Government</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>There is convincing evidence that people WANT to believe that a "higher being"
      exists, but there has never been one shred of evidence that proves the case. Given
      that billions of people have been trying for thousands of years to find that proof,
      I think it's safe to say that this God character is just a character.</em></div></body><title>There is no convincing evidence that a higher being exists. (Religion)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/8837</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/8837</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 13:25:33 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;There is convincing evidence that people WANT to believe that a "higher being" exists, but there has never been one shred of evidence that proves the case.  Given that billions of people have been trying for thousands of years to find that proof, I think it's safe to say that this God character is just a character.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Religion</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>The first round of stimulus checks didn't work. Now, most Americans don't even
      have enough money for back to school supplies for their kids - and we're further in
      debt to China.</em></div></body><title>Congress should not issue a second round of the 2008 stimulus checks. (U.S. Economy)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/51359</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/51359</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 13:22:00 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;The first round of stimulus checks didn't work. Now, most Americans don't even have enough money for back to school supplies for their kids - and we're further in debt to China.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>U.S. Economy</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>Look - it's called a wildlife refuge for a reason. If the Republicans want to
      go drilling there, let them pass an act of Congress renaming the place the Arctic
      National Oil Company Refuge.</em></div></body><title>The U.S. should not allow drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. (ANWR). (Oil Dependence)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/1016</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/1016</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 13:20:25 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;Look - it's called a wildlife refuge for a reason. If the Republicans want to go drilling there, let them pass an act of Congress renaming the place the Arctic National Oil Company Refuge.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Oil Dependence</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>Years have passed, and the inaction supported by Palin Republicans has been repudiated
      by science, and by widespread disasters. </em></div></body><title>The U.S. should have signed the Kyoto Treaty. (Kyoto Protocol)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/7763</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/7763</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:53:18 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;Years have passed, and the inaction supported by Palin Republicans has been repudiated by science, and by widespread disasters.  &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Kyoto Protocol</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>No, they're not equivalent, any more than sticking a spade into the ground is
      equivalent to mountain top removal coal mining. The scale is almost unimaginably different.</em></div></body><title>The use of birth control is not equivalent to abortion. (The Abortion Debate)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/55802</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/55802</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 22:05:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;No, they're not equivalent, any more than sticking a spade into the ground is equivalent to mountain top removal coal mining.  The scale is almost unimaginably different.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>The Abortion Debate</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>Sarah Palin is an ideological extremist who is clearly in the pocket of Big Oil,
      inexperienced and untested, running as the 1st in line to succeed to the Presidency
      with a presidential candidate who likely would not survive his first term in office.
      The pick of Sarah Palin shows McCain's lack of judgment.</em></div></body><title>Sarah Palin was not a good choice for John McCain's vice presidential candidate. (John McCain-Sarah Palin)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/58215</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/58215</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:53:49 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;Sarah Palin is an ideological extremist who is clearly in the pocket of Big Oil, inexperienced and untested, running as the 1st in line to succeed to the Presidency with a presidential candidate who likely would not survive his first term in office. The pick of Sarah Palin shows McCain's lack of judgment.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>John McCain-Sarah Palin</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>A warrant is proof that a wiretap is needed to deal with criminal behavior. If
      the government can't provide proof - even 72 hours after the fact as the old FISA
      allowed, they shouldn't be allowed to spy on Americans - period.</em></div></body><title>The President should not order domestic warrantless wiretaps to combat terrorism. (NSA Surveillance Program)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/4412</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/4412</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:26:44 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;A warrant is proof that a wiretap is needed to deal with criminal behavior.  If the government can't provide proof - even 72 hours after the fact as the old FISA allowed, they shouldn't be allowed to spy on Americans - period.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>NSA Surveillance Program</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>While people are filling the gas tanks of jet skis at 1 to 5 miles per gallon,
      no, we don't need offshore drilling. If there's really a supply problem with gasoline,
      let's ban jet skis, producing an instant increase in the gasoline supply, not an increase
      that will come after 15-20 years, as would happen with offshore drilling.</em></div></body><title>Congress should not lift the ban on offshore oil drilling. (Oil Dependence)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/50066</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/50066</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:17:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;While people are filling the gas tanks of jet skis at 1 to 5 miles per gallon, no, we don't need offshore drilling.  If there's really a supply problem with gasoline, let's ban jet skis, producing an instant increase in the gasoline supply, not an increase that will come after 15-20 years, as would happen with offshore drilling.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Oil Dependence</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>Journalists accepted government assertions at face value, and ignored evidence
      that contradicted the idea that a rush to war was necessary. Independent small media
      did a much better job covering the issues before the war.</em></div></body><title>The American news media did not appropriately handle coverage leading up to the war in Iraq. (News)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/48067</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/JCliffordCook/48067</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 15:11:50 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;Journalists accepted government assertions at face value, and ignored evidence that contradicted the idea that a rush to war was necessary.  Independent small media did a much better job covering the issues before the war.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>News</category></item></channel></rss>