DaveAR - whereIstand.comhttp://whereistand.com/DaveAR/whereIstand.com: DaveAR - whereIstand.comhttp://whereistand.com/DaveAR/ThumbnailDaveAR - whereIstand.comhttp://whereistand.com/DaveAR/en-usCopyright 2004-2008 whereIstand.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:01:59 GMTwhereIstand.com 2.3nick@whereIstand.comnick@whereIstand.comauthor added
Probably not.
Humans will not make contact with intelligent extraterrestrial life. (Space Exploration)http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/19115http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/19115Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:15:12 GMT<div> <em>Probably not.</em> </div>Space Explorationauthor added
The U.S. should not send military forces to Sudan. (Sudan)http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/5255http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/5255Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:04:08 GMT<div> </div>Sudanauthor added
Hamas does not want to negotiate. They want only the destruction of Israel (a well-publicized part of their charter). How can Israel possibly negotiate with that? They must eliminate that threat. I think Israel can, however, possibly negotiate with the slightly more moderate Palestinian faction, Fatah.
Israel should not negotiate with Hamas. (Gaza)http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/70271http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/70271Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:35:51 GMT<div> <em>Hamas does not want to negotiate. They want only the destruction of Israel (a well-publicized part of their charter). How can Israel possibly negotiate with that? They must eliminate that threat. I think Israel can, however, possibly negotiate with the slightly more moderate Palestinian faction, Fatah. </em> </div>Gazaauthor added
Don't athletes in other professional sports leagues have a drug-testing policy?
The PGA should institute a drug-testing policy. (PGA)http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/26618http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/26618Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:05:13 GMT<div> <em>Don't athletes in other professional sports leagues have a drug-testing policy?</em> </div>PGAauthor added
I doubt it.
Boxing will not regain its popularity in America. (Boxing)http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/26128http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/26128Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:03:32 GMT<div> <em>I doubt it.</em> </div>Boxingauthor added
Skills are essential, but luck ends up being the biggest factor in this game. A good player that knows the strategies can stack the chips in his favor (pardon the pun), but unlike poker (a true skill game), it comes down to the luck of the draw.
Luck is the bigger factor in Blackjack. (Blackjack)http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/27756http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/27756Thu, 08 Jan 2009 17:00:48 GMT<div> <em>Skills are essential, but luck ends up being the biggest factor in this game. A good player that knows the strategies can stack the chips in his favor (pardon the pun), but unlike poker (a true skill game), it comes down to the luck of the draw. </em> </div>Blackjackauthor added
They are important to have in case of emergencies. There's no reason to ban cell phones altogether. But I think they should be banned in classrooms, or they should at least be required to be kept off during school.
Cell phones should not be banned in public schools. (Education Policy)http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/36900http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/36900Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:52:47 GMT<div> <em>They are important to have in case of emergencies. There's no reason to ban cell phones altogether. But I think they should be banned in classrooms, or they should at least be required to be kept off during school. </em> </div>Education Policyauthor added
If some parents think their kids need to be taught about sex earlier than high school, then they should act like parents and do the teaching.
Sex education should begin during high school (9th-12th grade). (Curriculum )http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/27705http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/27705Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:44:53 GMT<div> <em>If some parents think their kids need to be taught about sex earlier than high school, then they should act like parents and do the teaching. </em> </div>Curriculum author added
Yes, it's a good idea to offer it as an optional benefit. Why not? It should not be required, though.
Employers should offer health savings accounts. (Healthcare)http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/17960http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/17960Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:31:02 GMT<div> <em>Yes, it's a good idea to offer it as an optional benefit. Why not? It should not be required, though. </em> </div>Healthcareauthor added
This is a seriously loaded question. Because life is the most precious thing in the world, both are extremely important.
Saving existing life is more important than protecting potential life. (Stem cell research)http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/232http://whereistand.com/DaveAR/232Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:28:15 GMT<div> <em>This is a seriously loaded question. Because life is the most precious thing in the world, both are extremely important. </em> </div>Stem cell research