<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" version="2.0"><channel><title>brianr - whereIstand.com</title><link>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/</link><description>whereIstand.com: brianr - whereIstand.com</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2004-2008 whereIstand.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.</copyright><lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:23:19 GMT</lastBuildDate><generator>whereIstand.com 2.3</generator><managingEditor>nick@whereIstand.com</managingEditor><webMaster>nick@whereIstand.com</webMaster><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>This team will ensure that Obama is surrounded by diverse, strong and experienced
      judgment. It's a matter of how well they all work together and it seems evident that
      Obama and his top advisers know a thing or two about running a tight ship. I really
      don't have many concerns about the personalities in this team, either. Jim Jones,
      Biden, Gates, Clinton all have an amazing track record of working well with others
      when it comes to crafting policy. That's a fact. </em></div></body><title>I rate Barack Obama's national security team "Satisfactory." (Obama Administration)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/67242</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/67242</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 20:04:58 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;This team will ensure that Obama is surrounded by diverse, strong and experienced judgment. It's a matter of how well they all work together and it seems evident that Obama and his top advisers know a thing or two about running a tight ship. I really don't have many concerns about the personalities in this team, either. Jim Jones, Biden, Gates, Clinton all have an amazing track record of working well with others when it comes to crafting policy. That's a fact. &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Obama Administration</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div></div></body><title>The U.S. recession will last throughout 2009. (U.S. Economy)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/65652</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/65652</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:48:42 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>U.S. Economy</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><title>Management is most responsible for the U.S. auto industry's financial problems. (Automobile Industry)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/66017</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/66017</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:37:55 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;Read some interesting stats today: "Honda has never had an unprofitable year. It has never had to lay off employees. In the fiscal year that ended in March, profit grew 12%, to $5.1 billion, on $84 billion in sales. In the U.S., which accounts for 43% of Honda's sales, vehicle sales are up 7% through July, even as the industry slipped 5%." Honda spent over $4 billion on R&amp;D last year. Let's stop blaming labor unions or the financial crisis for the U.S. auto industry's problems. They could be in much better shape if they had half the type of management Honda does.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Automobile Industry</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>She's looking like our next Secretary of State.</em></div></body><title>Hillary Clinton will be in Barack Obama's cabinet. (Obama Administration)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/65714</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/65714</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 17:25:31 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;She's looking like our next Secretary of State.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Obama Administration</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>In 1860, Abraham Lincoln defeated a New York senator, William H. Seward, for the
      Republican nomination. Seward was a major figure in the Republican Party and a heavy
      favorite entering that election. Lincoln ended up offering his top rival the position
      of Secretary of State. We could use another Lincoln these days. Offering Hillary the
      position certainly worries me because we can't afford another Clintonian soap opera
      surrounding the Obama presidency. But clearly Obama proved in the primaries he can
      manage the Clintons very well. Let's face it...Hillary is smart, tough and respected
      around the world. If she feels this will be her legacy she will do great things as
      Secretary of State. </em></div></body><title>Barack Obama should offer Hillary Clinton the position of Secretary of State. (Obama Administration)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/66066</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/66066</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 18:25:20 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;In 1860, Abraham Lincoln defeated a New York senator, William H. Seward, for the Republican nomination. Seward was a major figure in the Republican Party and a heavy favorite entering that election. Lincoln ended up offering his top rival the position of Secretary of State. We could use another Lincoln these days. Offering Hillary the position certainly worries me because we can't afford another Clintonian soap opera surrounding the Obama presidency. But clearly Obama proved in the primaries he can manage the Clintons very well.  Let's face it...Hillary is smart, tough and respected around the world. If she feels this will be her legacy she will do great things as Secretary of State. &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Obama Administration</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>@Geoff I have to agree. It should be Tina Fey for being Sarah Palin and for her
      success with 30 Rock. I'm out of the loop but I have no idea what Robert Downey Jr.
      did this year to merit this award. I know he did something and he's certainly one
      talented mofo., but someone please fill me in.</em></div></body><title>Robert Downey Jr. should not be Entertainment Weekly's 2008 Entertainer of the Year. (Performing Arts)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/65719</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/65719</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:26:30 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;@Geoff I have to agree. It should be Tina Fey for being Sarah Palin and for her success with 30 Rock. I'm out of the loop but I have no idea what Robert Downey Jr. did this year to merit this award. I know he did something and he's certainly one talented mofo., but someone please fill me in.&lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Performing Arts</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>Very painful but the loss of jobs would be more painful for the country right
      now. It could present a wonderful opportunity for the government to go in and clean
      house, by removing the boards and management of the big three and by including conditions
      that could put the industry on a path towards being more competitive. Save the auto
      industry, reform it and the health care industry and this will be a price worth paying
      for. </em></div></body><title>The U.S. federal government should provide financial support to its auto industry. (Financial Crisis - 2008)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/64647</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/64647</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:29:08 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;Very painful but the loss of jobs would be more painful for the country right now. It could present a wonderful opportunity for the government to go in and clean house, by removing the boards and management of the big three and by including conditions that could put the industry on a path towards being more competitive. Save the auto industry, reform it and the health care industry and this will be a price worth paying for. &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Financial Crisis - 2008</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div><em>Hillary certainly would have won but I think it would have been a little closer.
      Should would not have won Virginia or North Carolina and I can't imagine she would
      have won 67 million votes, like Obama, which is roughly 5 million votes more than
      any other presidential candidate has ever gotten. If Obama lost the primary after
      a long and hard fight young voters and African Americans would have been demoralized
      and turnout amongst those groups would have been significantly lower, me thinks. </em></div></body><title>Hillary Clinton would not have beaten John McCain by a wider margin than Barack Obama (2008 Presidential Election)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/65624</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/65624</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:12:15 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;
	&lt;em&gt;Hillary certainly would have won but I think it would have been a little closer. Should would not have won Virginia or North Carolina and I can't imagine she would have won 67 million votes, like Obama, which is roughly 5 million votes more than any other presidential candidate has ever gotten. If Obama lost the primary after a long and hard fight young voters and African Americans would have been demoralized and turnout amongst those groups would have been significantly lower, me thinks. &lt;/em&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>2008 Presidential Election</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div></div></body><title>Plastic grocery bags should be banned. (Waste Management)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/22847</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/22847</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 18:02:41 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Waste Management</category></item><item xml:lang="en-us"><dc:creator xmlns:dc="target">author added</dc:creator><body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div></div></body><title>Barack Obama should not offer Hillary Clinton the position of Secretary of Health and Human Services. (Obama Administration)</title><guid>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/65357</guid><link>http://whereistand.com/BrianR/65357</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:11:23 GMT</pubDate><description>&lt;div&gt;

&lt;/div&gt;</description><category>Obama Administration</category></item></channel></rss>