Should tobacco companies be liable for smoke-related health problems?

<< Business

Recent Opinions

The New York Times
	Tobacco companies should be liable for smoke-related health problems. The Supreme Court handed tobacco companies a major and well-deserved setback...
	1/23/2009 3:54:45 PM

St. Louis Post-Dispatch
	Tobacco companies should be liable for smoke-related health problems. They have a lot to answer for
	1/23/2009 11:43:32 AM

American Heart Association
	Tobacco companies should be liable for smoke-related health problems. Smokers who have been deceived by Big Tobacco’s dubious marketing practices are now in a better position to hold the industry accountable.
	1/23/2009 1:07:15 AM

Jay Nixon (D-MO)
	Tobacco companies should be liable for smoke-related health problems. Tobacco companies have lied about the addictive nature of their product and hidden from public view research which indicates health dangers.
	10/31/2008 1:49:34 PM

Tucker Carlson
	Tobacco companies should not be liable for smoke-related health problems. "Tell me, how are the tobacco companies responsible when smokers, knowing that smoking kills them, continue to smoke?"
	8/20/2008 11:11:54 AM

James Surowiecki
	Tobacco companies should not be liable for smoke-related health problems. Seeking punitive damages is a "Draconian" solution
	8/20/2008 11:11:34 AM

American Cancer Society
	Tobacco companies should be liable for smoke-related health problems. ACS praised a verdict to award punitive damages in Florida
	8/20/2008 11:10:51 AM

Washington Post
	Tobacco companies should be liable for smoke-related health problems. Punitive damages should not be excessive and should become public funds
	8/19/2008 10:32:33 AM