This issue has been approved by whereIstand editors.
This page shows the dialogue between users and editors regarding the merits of this issue. If you have comments about the issue's wording, relevance, etc., write them here. Only registered whereIstand members can edit an issue. Users must register in order to participate in all aspects of the whereIstand community.
whereIstand admin
744 Opinions
76 Followers
I'm not a big fan of the English language. To me, "horseys" is more naturale. I agree with marinaz though, this is an issue because of the "horseys." I'm not sure it would generate the same buzz if we're talking about deer and kangaroo, which are considered by many to be pests.
whereIstand editor
305 Opinions
17 Followers
Yeah, let's keep it to horseys (horsies?). I think a lot of people might react differently with animals that are regularly hunted for recreation...
75 Opinions
14 Followers
Looks good to me.
Only reservation is whether we should take it more general -- about euthanizing wild populations of [insert type of animal here].
But I think there will be different enough reactions to different animals that it probably wouldn't work. (Save the horseys, but those damn deer are eating all my flowers...)
Ooh there was some controversy about kangaroos in Oz that seems similar, though. (Same thing, killing them because there were too many.)
Maybe something about contraceptive measures rather than killing?
Just thinking aloud, prolly have to keep it to horseys.
Poor horseys. I don't see any reason not to approve this. Anyone have reservations?
360 Opinions
30 Followers
I don't think there's an appropriate sub-topic yet for this issue, so I went with general "Environment"... here's some background from AOL News:
Horse advocates will mount a campaign against the proposal announced late last month by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, said Chris Heyde, deputy director of government and legal affairs for the Animal Welfare Institute based in Washington, D.C. Federal officials said they're faced with tough choices because wild horses have overpopulated public lands in the West and they no longer can afford to care for the number of animals that have been rounded up. The proposal "is killing pure and simple to balance the books for an agency whose reckless management has caused immeasurable harm to a national treasure at considerable cost to the American taxpayer," Heyde said. The Bureau of Land Management's announcement marked the first time the agency publicly has discussed the possibility of putting surplus animals to death. Congress unanimously passed the 1971 Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act to protect the animals.
You must be signed in to participate on whereIstand.com.
Register now to take stands, follow people and issues, request opinions and interact with other whereIstand members.