Do the economic benefits of a weak U.S. dollar outweigh the costs?

Yes
No
Resources for this issue
Reviews of this issue

This issue has been approved by whereIstand editors.

Do not use this page to take a stand on this issue.

This page shows the dialogue between users and editors regarding the merits of this issue. If you have comments about the issue's wording, relevance, etc., write them here. Only registered whereIstand members can edit an issue. Users must register in order to participate in all aspects of the whereIstand community.

6/19/2008 5:33:15 PM

Set as news: False

6/3/2008 2:55:09 PM

Set as news: True

previous version of issue

Do the benefits of a weaker US Dollar outweigh the costs?

    1/17/2008 7:54:00 PM

    I'm in.

    1/17/2008 2:57:12 PM

    Yeah, "economic" should be added... also, I think Marina's suggestion of "weak" instead of "weaker" might make more sense.

    1/16/2008 9:31:16 AM

    Do the economic benefits of a weaker U.S. dollar outweigh the costs?

     

    Everyone okay with this revision?

    1/16/2008 9:30:21 AM

    Steve Forbes: A weak-currency policy has disastrous economic and political consequences--most immediately, our tumultuous equity markets.

    1/15/2008 2:59:28 PM

    I think the issue is clear as is; maybe "weak" rather than "weaker."  I can't think of how better to word it otherwise.

    1/15/2008 12:47:23 PM

    Do you need to say "economic benefits"?

    1/15/2008 11:59:50 AM

    PBS - U.S. Dollar Hurting Tourists And Global Businesses

     

    I like this issue. It's obviously very relevant and an interesting debate.