This issue has been approved by whereIstand editors.
This page shows the dialogue between users and editors regarding the merits of this issue. If you have comments about the issue's wording, relevance, etc., write them here. Only registered whereIstand members can edit an issue. Users must register in order to participate in all aspects of the whereIstand community.
whereIstand admin
776 Opinions
88 Followers
Great.
whereIstand editor
833 Opinions
94 Followers
Dr. Z (aka Paul Zimmerman) says its not enough. Dan Reeve said today on Mike and the Mad Dog is was satisfactory. Russo agreed. All personalities on ESPN Radio took a stand and had a bunch of guests take stands as well
Way ahead of me. Nice job. I think this is ready, right?
762 Opinions
12 Followers
Changed.
312 Opinions
18 Followers
"Appropriate" is the way to go...
- Evidence - Evidence - Evidence
Good idea, Brian. Ask if the punishment was appropriate. I'll change it.
Okay, they got whacked with a fine and will lose their first round draft pick next year. Maybe... Should Belichick be suspended or was the punishment appropriate?
Yeah, its not a matter of 'should' at this point - its 'what' I think the punishment will likely be a draft pick but what round will be subject for discussion (top-, mid- or late- round picks) and I've also heard some PF's say Bellichick should be suspended and/or fined. What a dirtbag though. He gave every NFL fan the opening they've always wanted to question the credibility of the success of Brady and the Pats dynasty.
Let's find out what Goodell is probably going to do and ask that. I've heard they're going to lose draft picks. They should lose games!
The other option is asking what the punishment should be. Here's one writer's opinion. There are plenty more, as this is a hot topic.
You must be signed in to participate on whereIstand.com.
Register now to take stands, follow people and issues, request opinions and interact with other whereIstand members.