This issue has been approved by whereIstand editors.
This page shows the dialogue between users and editors regarding the merits of this issue. If you have comments about the issue's wording, relevance, etc., write them here. Only registered whereIstand members can edit an issue. Users must register in order to participate in all aspects of the whereIstand community.
whereIstand admin
776 Opinions
88 Followers
Set as news: False
Set as news: True
whereIstand member
272 Opinions
10 Followers
Run, Forrest, run!
Pak warns US against action on its soil
353 Opinions
3 Followers
I like the way it's worded: not "against Pakistan" (heaven help us) but ""inside of Pakistan." It also seems to cover the possibility that we do it after inducing Pakistan to cooperate (not as big a problem), and the possibility that we don't. What it does contemplate is "U.S. military action," as opposed to merely support for Pakistan military action. Looks good to me!
This is a pretty crazy issue that more people need to talk about. Or maybe they don't. I wish it would go away. The Bush Administration has passed up two big opportunities to attack Al-Qaeda cells in Pakistan because they are afraid it would cause such a stir that might eventually overthrow Musharraf. WP editorial
Facing al-Qaeda With the terrorists growing stronger, their sanctuary in Pakistan must be eliminated.
You must be signed in to participate on whereIstand.com.
Register now to take stands, follow people and issues, request opinions and interact with other whereIstand members.