Should Iraq be the central front in the war on terror?

Yes
No
Resources for this issue
Reviews of this issue

This issue has been approved by whereIstand editors.

Do not use this page to take a stand on this issue.

This page shows the dialogue between users and editors regarding the merits of this issue. If you have comments about the issue's wording, relevance, etc., write them here. Only registered whereIstand members can edit an issue. Users must register in order to participate in all aspects of the whereIstand community.

7/30/2008 4:18:20 PM

Set as news: False

7/20/2008 4:12:35 PM

Set as news: True

7/10/2008 10:48:58 AM

Set as news: True

6/25/2008 11:41:02 AM

Set as news: False

6/25/2008 11:37:56 AM

Set as news: False

6/25/2008 10:16:03 AM

Set as news: False

1/3/2007 10:44:52 PM

great!

12/30/2006 10:47:30 AM

I like this question as well.  I'd say keep it.

12/29/2006 8:35:31 AM

i'm turning around on this issue:

from our favorite "Independent Democratic Senator from CT":

Iraq is the central front in the global and regional war against Islamic extremism.

12/8/2006 12:26:38 PM

Here's an interesting quote that applies...

Asked directly by Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.) whether Iraq was central to the war on terror, Baker said "it may not have been when we first went in," even though he felt "it certainly is now."


11/12/2006 3:02:55 PM

I agree with JHWhicker's reservations; nonetheless, I think the question serves its purpose and will provide ample material.

Keep it.




11/11/2006 1:29:48 PM

I'm not quite sure what this is asking.  Bush has made Iraq the US's primary concern until the US can extract itself.

It is questionable if Iraq can be logically linked to the greater "war on terror" at all.

I also think this would belong more in the War on terror subtopic.

10/13/2006 3:35:24 PM

Or "Is Iraq the central front in the war on terror?"