whereIstand member
353 Opinions
3 Followers
dated
whereIstand admin
813 Opinions
89 Followers
I'm down with it. It's fair and it's debatable.
635 Opinions
50 Followers
I like the revised... the previous would lump together the people that think republicans will benefit significantly with those that think democrats will benefit significantly.
here's my revision: What impact will the war in Iraq have on the 2006 elections? Republicans will benefit. Democrats will benefit.
right. i want to avoid the bias here but i get you guys. Which party will the war in Iraq negatively impact in the 2006 elections. Dems Republicans Neither I'm not thrilled with asking the negative side of the issue but i can't figure out a way to keep it neutral in the issue itself. I think we need to keep the parties listed as stands.
I like the idea of which party benefits most in the elections from the war.
whereIstand editor
608 Opinions
I thought we had an issue about whether one party or the other would be helped by the war. I don't really see the point of this question. How can you have elections during a war without the war affecting the elections? I think this is too vague.
i think this is highly relevant and debatable. Leiberman's election in CT seems to be turning on it. I think we scrapped something like it before but I'd like to see it approved.
You must be signed in to participate on whereIstand.com.
Register now to take stands, follow people and issues, request opinions and interact with other whereIstand members.