What are the appropriate next steps that the US should take in Lebanon?

Diplomatic measures
Military action
Wait and see
Resources for this issue
    Reviews of this issue

    This issue has been approved by whereIstand editors.

    Do not use this page to take a stand on this issue.

    This page shows the dialogue between users and editors regarding the merits of this issue. If you have comments about the issue's wording, relevance, etc., write them here. Only registered whereIstand members can edit an issue. Users must register in order to participate in all aspects of the whereIstand community.

    7/22/2006 1:10:48 PM

    issue revision:

    per comments
    Should the U.S. intervene diplomatically?

    7/22/2006 11:39:23 AM

    I'm with nick/brian on this one. crib the wording from the iran question, it already passed the test.

    7/22/2006 10:56:43 AM

    I like the yes/no question better.  Suggest:

    Should the US intervene in Israel/Lebanon?

    7/21/2006 3:52:54 PM

    issue revision:

    What are the appropriate next steps that the US should take?
    Should the U.S. intervene diplomatically?

    7/21/2006 3:36:51 PM

    Love both of your comments.  Jacki's right, we should debate that in the blogs, diplomatically or militarily.

    It applies just like the issue on Iran as Nick stated.  We should do that...

    7/21/2006 7:55:58 AM

    how about similar wording to the iran issue that says something like "what are the appropriate next steps"... and has options like "wait and see", "displomatic measures", etc.

    7/20/2006 10:06:19 PM

    let's define this a bit more.  how about:

    Should the U.S. intervene diplomatically with Israel and Lebanon?

    it's still clunky.  any other ideas?

    also, i feel we should broaden this and let people discuss in their blogs whether they think the US should intervene diplomatically or militarily.