This issue has been approved by whereIstand editors.
This page shows the dialogue between users and editors regarding the merits of this issue. If you have comments about the issue's wording, relevance, etc., write them here. Only registered whereIstand members can edit an issue. Users must register in order to participate in all aspects of the whereIstand community.
whereIstand member
315 Opinions
1 Followers
I concur.
353 Opinions
3 Followers
maybe brian is right. we can ask whether the military action has been successful and the blogs can talk about whether US nat'l security has improved as a result. i change my vote to: Has the coalition forces' military action in Afghanistan been successful?
whereIstand admin
816 Opinions
90 Followers
I'm sorry I'm still for "Has military action in Afghanistan been sucessful?"
what about revising "improved" to "affected"
i like whicker's revision.
That is definitely a relevant issue. How about:
Has the military action in Afghanistan improved our national security?
should we use 'military action" rather than war?
"Has the military action in Afghanistan been successful for the U.S?"
something about describing it as successful is weird to me. i still prefer posing in terms of American security bc really that is why we allegedly went into Afghanistan, correct?
thoughts everyone?
Has the war in Afghanistan been a success?
That makes it like the Iraq issue...I think it's fair to debate.
that's good...
how about:Has the war in Afghanistan made the U.S. more secure?
You must be signed in to participate on whereIstand.com.
Register now to take stands, follow people and issues, request opinions and interact with other whereIstand members.